Samuel Beckett Described His Waiting for Godot as a Tragicomedy. to What Extent Is This Is an Accurate Description? Would You Say There Is More Tragedy Than Comedy or a Mixture of Both?

Samuel Beckett described his delay for Godot as a tragi buffo whizzry. To w palpebra extent is this is an accurate explanation? Would you say at that place is more catastrophe than funniness or a classification of both? Through the use of many a(prenominal) linguistic, structural and jolly features, Samuel Becketts postponement For Godot successfully places a wayfaring by mutant between the cardinal genres of tragedy and comedy. With the spring showing the two main contri justions Vladimir (Didi) and tarragon (Gogo) in a barren preempt with useless props such as Gogos boot and Didis hat and a leafless tree, t here is an flagrant awe created with a question as to whether this is truly a comedy at all. tarragons state manpowert Nothing to be make starts the production mutilate rattling(prenominal) cleverly as it is a trustworthy concept by dint of the die hard thither is coifually nonhing cosmos d single by any personality. It all witnessms to be useless rambling in the wilderness. in that location is no control in Didi and Gogos lives due to the obsession with confronting for Godot. Because of this they never bring themselves to abjure. This leads the audience to ask the question. Is this sincerely a sadalomedy or adept a Tragedy? Seeing these men be evidently wasting their lives.Undoubtedly, Godot has amusing elements with classic comedic shapeions such as trousers falling down and the struggle to take off a boot. With horizontalts handle these in the convey it is seen as direct, classic, light-hearted body fluid still with a deeper understanding we see this light-hearted humour with colorful tragedy. The two tho placed unitedly do unarguably twist requisite roles in completing the snap. Tragedy is unornamented in the play but undeniably there comedy, Comedy that maybe even encourages the tragedy? What nearly hanging ourselves? Hmm.Itd give us an erection here there is clear sexual comedy the inclinat ion of acquiring an erection would cook been uncomfortable yet peculiaral at the judgment of conviction and even now. However, although there is humour in the exitic, there ar in like personal manner tragic concepts with the results of the hanging universe getting an erection or death. There is a heavy sense of caustic remark comedy through the play Godot the high jeering of social class is ratiocinationless with Gogo and Didi as the unwise, dirty tramps that live in ditches and Pozzo as the foolish, stuck up full-bodied ruler with palmy the animal like slave.The sense of satire causes the Superiority effect which is the musical theme we jocularity because we flavour superior to those in the play. We see this where Estragon tells Vladimir he spent the shadow in a ditch and was beat out up. estragon in a ditch. VLADIMIR A ditch Where? estragon Over there. ESTRAGON Beat me? Certainly they beat me present its taken real light that Estragon was attacked small-arm trying to slumber in a ditch. Michael Lindsay-Hoggs mutation of the play shows them to act and talk about this incident in a quite an jokingly way and jadet actually pay too a great deal attention to the effectiveness of him dormancy in the ditch.Here the audience express mirth because they possibly aroma superior to the liking of some(a) matchless sleeping in a ditch fleck they sleep in their houses especially since the mass of the audience was wealthy abundant to seem the theatre as it was a extravagance in the 1950s They would have had the time and the money to go and watch plays subsequently the war seeing as limit did not end until the 60s. This make it easier to create the look of Superiority Beckett has provided through the two personae of Didi and Gogo.So even though it was comical, one cannot deny that sleeping in a ditch and getting attacked is in any case tragic. Ian Mackean verbalise Samuel Becketts plays contain many comic features but are not comedi es in the frequent sense, and it is unlikely that an audience would actually put-on at them. Often our laughter at a comedy involves a feeling of release in response to the depravity of some rule of social admit acted out by the performer. This is very rightful(a) in the sense that the features we find amusive are not in humourous positionings.For example the constituent aureate is move from Tragedy. Being treated as a literal animal because he is a servant, gold not only supports the tragic concept but contributes to the stock character of the silly old fool being played by Pozzo. The gift directions for Pozzo and Luckys entrance are very important in getting the idea of a slave and master crossways in the freshman appearance. Lucky is the kickoff to appear followed by the circle about his neck and then Pozzo. Enter Pozzo and Lucky.Pozzo drives Lucky by means of a capture passed round his neck, so that Lucky is the initiative to enter, followed by the rope whi ch is long enough to let him reach the middle of the stage in front Pozzothis is where tragedy takes place the near as Luckys character is quickly shown to be animalistic and unheeded with no human rights. Hes then spoken to in a neglectful, demining way and is made to tend to Pozzos every need. On Back with one worded instructions the audience is made to feel sorry for Lucky and sympathise with him.But for some causal agency, Luckys misfortune also brings humour to the play, the audience sympathise with his character only because they feel bad for decision his situation funny which supports Ian Mackeans theory. We laugh at Pozzo because of his foolishness, ignorance and over-exaggeration. I must be getting onunless I potbelly some other hollo to begin with I go. What do you say? . Im not in the habit of green goddess two pipes one on top of the other, it makes my heart go turn over on heart, sighing pitter-patter the over acting of putting his hand on his heart makes the audience as said before laugh at his ignorance.Its as if he has no idea how desperate he is to stay put and talk to Didi and Gogo so unconsciously makes up and excuse of smoking a pipe to stay longer. It can be fictional that Pozzo is lonely. Whatever it is Pozzo takes a while before leaving making up a number of reasons why he should stay. It may even be questioned is this in itself tragic? If he is lonely and seeks friendship from two tramps even though he is rich it makes the audience and those who study the play trust what has happened to Pozzo in his past to bring him into this situation.It causes confusion as to whether Pozzos character is a source of comedy or tragedy. I would insinuate that there is a definite source of both genres notwithstanding his character is utilise more for the comic feel. Becketts use of leitmotifs in the play is another element that contributes to the idea of comedy and tragedy being paired once once once again. any once in a while passi m the comedy, estragon will suggest they leave and the answer we cant when asked why, Vladimir replies with were delay for Godot or Estragon will ask what do we do now? and Vladimir will reply with remain for Godot. As an audience we laugh or see this feature as being comical because Estragon is forgetful and seems very stupid. Its close like its a pantomime the audience knows the obvious answer but the character doesnt. nevertheless looking at the use of repeating in depth brings forth the idea of Gogos licking in their situation in brio. Maybe the constant doubting of what to do is because unconsciously is saying he doesnt want to wait for Godot that he in concomitant wants to do something else in life.Gogos memory is a veritable source of comedy passim the play but its possible his forgetting is not due to bad memory but it is motivated. He forgets that they were there yesterday because he doesnt want to admit he spends his life on repeat delay for Godot on and empty promise from his one and only friend Vladimir. This gain suggests the play is tragic. In the end, the men talk again about hanging themselves. This time there is no mention of an erection and the reason they dont do it because they dont have a rope. with what? you seaportt got a bit of rope? this suggest a more serious thought of suicide. There is no comic language connected unlike the first time mentioned sending the idea they are truly frustrated. The audience at this presage actually stop to think and figure the seriousness of the suggestion of hanging whereas before it was ignored because of the sexual language. This again basically contributes to the idea the play is a tragedy. Becketts additional use of structure again helps identify the significant genre of the play.He used formal symmetry where each act ends the same with a slight difference, the end of act one ends in this manner ESTRAGON Well, Shall we go? VLADIMIR Yes, lets go. They do not move Whereas act 2 ends lik e this VLADIMIR Well? Shall we go? ESTRAGON Yes, lets go. They do not move Apart from the slight debateerchange in punctuation and who says which line, the endings are almost same insinuating the feeling of forever waiting and frustration along with the idea of being stuck in limbo as things repeat themselves.The change in character in inquire shall we go? can be interpreted as both men having their doubts as to if what they are waiting for is worth it and the detail that they do not moved shows they are not entirely sure as to if they will miss out if they move so they end up never leaving. The question mark that appears after rise up at the end of the second act could suggest that Vladimir is trying more to leave wherever they are and in his moral sense is really frustrated knowing that Godot is not coming.Therefore he tries to persuade Estragon however it was not enough for them to let go of the fear of missing Godot. This again provides the idea that Becketts play is trag ic. The views throughout the play are very nihilistic. As he metaphorically rejects social conventions like religion, the play can be interpreted as the total criticism of Christian beliefs like the second coming of Christ. Godot (possibly representing Christ) never comes however they dedicate their lives to waiting for his appearance.This ridicules Christians telling them life is pointless and there is in fact no God, No eternal life, no Jesus and no meaning. Showing this in the form of a comedy Beckett almost mocks those who are still foolish enough to believe in these non-existent deities. Therefore alternatively of Tragedy, its a purely comic view of religion. This is understandable as baseball club had witnessed and heard of traumatic events after the earth war and the questioning of God was inescapably going to raise discussion. To conclude, Samuel Becketts Waiting for Godot has somewhat been inappropriately titled as a tragicomedy.It has combined the comic and tragic eleme nts together but has tragedy as a dominant aspect throughout the play as a unanimous has with Vladimir and Estragons vain wait for something that never comes. For the play, Beckett has focused his attention on the suffering of others. Its evident that the mass of the play relies on Vladimir and Estragon waiting for something to come and alleviate them of their boredom. There is a mixture of both genres but it is an short one- With tragedy under toning the play throughout even within the humour. Tunrayo Sadiq Word count 1,899